Distortions of
Race, Class, and Gender in Advertisements and Commercials
Distorted depictions of
race, class, and gender have been portrayed for plenty of years in
advertisements. In Cultural Studies:
Theory and Practice representation is meant to “raise questions of
inclusion and exclusion” (271). In the 1960s, the media industry was deciding
how race, class, and gender would be presented in advertisements. During the
late 1960s representations of minority groups in the media was frowned upon in
American society (Hollifield and Kimbro, 2010).
Since the majority culture was mainly advertised during that time,
television networks wanted media to align with the social reality. A report from
the National Advisory Committee on Civil Disorders in 1968 found that the media
industry did not have a diversified staff in the 1960s. Therefore, Caucasian
males were the leaders of the media industry and a part of the dominant culture,
so they mainly endorsed their views in advertisements. Likewise, advertisements
that showcased African-Americans, Asian-Americans, or Latin Americans were not
publicly acceptable because Caucasians males did not deem these races as equal.
Separation of gender also
existed in advertisements during 1960s. For instance, most advertisements
featured women as a mother or a sexy vixen. Similarly, women were seen as the
subordinates in heterosexual relationships. The image with a woman and three male
children display that women’s role mainly involved being a mother who raised
her children. This is suggested with the woman’s position in the advertisement where
she mirrors a mother nurturing her children. Next, the picture of a man blowing
smoke in a woman’s face has a sexual suggestive line, which reads “blow in her
face and she'll follow you anywhere.” In this advertisement, it could be
perceived that men who smoke could easily attract women for their pleasure.
Also, the advertisement pinpoints the dominance men had over women with them being
showcased as sex symbols during the 1960s.
Then, in today’s society there are diversified depictions
of race, class, and gender in commercials. It seems that companies are striving
to target multiple races, classes, and genders, instead focusing on the
majority group. For example, commercials will feature African-Americans, Latin
Americans, Asian Americans, same-sex couples, women in power positions, and stay-at-home
fathers. During the 1960s, this range of race, class, and gender was not
present in advertisements. However, the depictions that are being showcased in commercials
today are still misconstrued. For instance, I will watch a commercial about an
African-American family eating a KFC dinner, and this commercial is misconstrued
because it promotes the stereotype that most African-Americans prefer fast food
over preparing the meal their selves. This example is misleading because it
assumes that all African-Americans cannot afford to buy enough groceries for
every meal, so purchasing bargain meals is more ideal for this culture. However,
in reality not all African-Americans are middle-class or living
paycheck-to-paycheck and some can afford to shop at Whole Foods every week.
Currently, race in society plays two roles that
contradict each other. The first role involves race as an ideal in society and
the second role includes racism in society. In Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice Barker notes that “race is
held to be a current ‘problem’ and yet racism is regarded as a thing of the
past” (278). This statement is a contradiction because if race is a problem
than racism must also be a problem, since racism stems from race. Commercials
reveal how race and racism are problematic in today’s society. Walmart’s
commercial “Tomorrow Starts Today” is a prime example of how commercials
display depictions of race and racism in society. This commercial shows a Caucasian
male as the manager and African-Americans, Latin Americans, and other Caucasians
as the workers; this is racially problematic because it presents the ideal that
Caucasian males are still in charge while minorities are working effortlessly
to retain their low-level jobs. It could be inferred that Walmart intended for
the commercial to show equality among workers for the future, but the multiple
distorted depictions generated the opposite effect. Next, Target’s Bella Thorne
Chris Noth commercial provides the view that racism is over. In this
commercial, women, men, the young, the elderly, African-Americans, and Caucasians
are seen to have equal status based on their clothing, body language, and
dialogue with each other. Also, the shape of the community in this commercial
is the formation of a circle, which is similar to Target’s logo. The symbolism
between the shape of the community and Target’s logo communicates that everyone
has equal status racially, socially, and gender wise.
No comments:
Post a Comment